Nowadays, a significant amount of money is spent on the maintenance of old structures in many cities. Some people believe that the same amount may be utilized for other infrastructure projects instead of the above. This essay will elaborate on both sides and thus will lead to logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why building should be restored and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that historical buildings play a key role to preserve the culture and promote tourism. The road side buildings in old cities are usually stone structures that represent the culture and heritage of that place. Many of them are in poor condition. Even so, in my opinion, they should be restored because these buildings are strongly attached to the history of the city. If they are demolished, a part of the history will also die out and it is a national loss. On the other hand, maintaining buildings of historical value in good condition is a great way to bring tourism to the city. The tourism generates new employment opportunities and revenue, which is beneficial to the local economy. Therefore, spending on preserving ancient buildings should be prioritised.
Having said that, those buildings that are beyond repair should definitely be demolished and new structures should be built in their place. Allowing them to stay in their dilapidated state poses serious threat to life and property.
In light of discussion above, it can be concluded that the maintenance and preservation of ancient buildings is prominent, although those buildings that cannot be restored should be destroyed.
